Our Approach

Built on real science.
Written for real people.

Every assessment on Official Mind Profile is grounded in validated psychological research — adapted to be accessible, informative and genuinely useful for self-discovery.

🔬

Validated instruments

Every test is based on a peer-reviewed screening tool used in clinical and academic settings worldwide — not invented from scratch.

✍️

Written for humans

Clinical language is translated into plain English. Results are written as personal reports — not just a score and a label.

🔒

Transparent about limits

We are clear that our assessments are for self-discovery only. They do not diagnose. We always point to professional support where relevant.

Why we use validated instruments

There are thousands of online personality quizzes and "tests" that are built entirely without any research basis. They may be entertaining, but they tell you nothing meaningful about yourself. We chose a different approach.

Every assessment on Official Mind Profile is adapted from an instrument that has been developed, tested and validated by psychologists and researchers — often over decades. These instruments have established reliability (they produce consistent results) and validity (they actually measure what they claim to measure). Using them as a foundation means our assessments have a genuine basis in how the human mind actually works.

That said, we are not a clinical service. Our adaptations are designed for general self-report use, not diagnosis. The difference between what we offer and a clinical assessment is explained clearly throughout the platform and in our Medical & Health Disclaimer.

What "adapted" means

When we say our assessments are "adapted from" a validated instrument, here is exactly what that means in practice:

What we keep the same

  • The underlying psychological constructs being measured (e.g. inattention, anxiety frequency, attachment anxiety)
  • The scoring structure and threshold categories established in published research
  • The number of items and scale format where clinically established (e.g. GAD-7 remains 7 items, 0–3 scale)
  • The validated interpretation categories (e.g. minimal / mild / moderate / severe)

What we change

  • Language is simplified and modernised for a general adult audience — without changing meaning
  • Some clinical phrasing is adjusted to be accessible without a psychology background
  • Results are expanded into full written reports rather than brief clinical summaries
  • Contextual information is added to help users understand what their result means and what to do next
  • Design and user experience is built around self-discovery rather than clinical administration

These adaptations do not change what is being measured. They change how accessible and useful the experience is for someone taking an assessment on their own, without a clinician present.

Instruments and citations

Below is a complete list of the psychological instruments our assessments are based on, with citations. This list is updated as new assessments are added to the platform.

Assessment Instrument Citation
🧠IQ Test Self-report screening quiz using fluid intelligence question formats (matrix reasoning, number sequences, spatial reasoning). Not a standardised psychometric IQ assessment. Formats informed by fluid intelligence research (Cattell, 1963)
ADHD Assessment Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale (ASRS-v1.1) Kessler et al. (2005); WHO
🌊Anxiety Assessment Generalised Anxiety Disorder scale (GAD-7) Spitzer, Kroenke, Williams & Löwe (2006)
🌧️Depression Screening Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) Kroenke, Spitzer & Williams (2001)
🔥Stress Assessment Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10) Cohen, Kamarck & Mermelstein (1983)
🔗Attachment Style Experiences in Close Relationships (ECR) Hazan & Shaver (1987); Bartholomew & Horowitz (1991); Brennan et al. (1998)
🔄OCD Assessment Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory–Revised (OCI-R) Foa et al. (2002)
🛡️PTSD Screening PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) Weathers et al. (2013); US National Center for PTSD
〰️Bipolar Screening DSM-5 bipolar criteria and mood episode framework, adapted as Likert screening tool Hirschfeld et al. (2000); APA DSM-5
😴Sleep Assessment Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) concepts with modified scoring for self-report use Buysse et al. (1989)
😤Anger Assessment State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory (STAXI-2) Spielberger (1999)
🌈Autism Spectrum Autism Spectrum Quotient (AQ) Baron-Cohen et al. (2001)
🎭Personality Test Myers-Briggs Type Indicator framework (MBTI theory) Myers & Briggs (1944); Jung (1921)
🔩Big Five (OCEAN) International Personality Item Pool (IPIP-NEO) Goldberg (1992); Costa & McCrae (1992)
Enneagram Riso-Hudson Enneagram Type Indicator (RHETI) Riso & Hudson (1996)
🔋Introvert / Extrovert Eysenck Personality Inventory (EPI) — Extraversion dimension Eysenck & Eysenck (1964)
🪞Narcissism Test Narcissistic Personality Inventory (NPI) conceptual framework, adapted as Likert scale Raskin & Terry (1988)
🌑Dark Triad Short Dark Triad (SD3) Jones & Paulhus (2014)
🎭Psychopathy Assessment Levenson Self-Report Psychopathy Scale (LSRP) Levenson, Kiehl & Fitzpatrick (1995)
🌊BPD Screening McLean Screening Instrument for BPD (MSI-BPD) Zanarini et al. (2003)
💎Self-Esteem Test Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES) Rosenberg (1965)
❤️Emotional Intelligence Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Emotional Intelligence framework Mayer, Salovey & Caruso (1990)
💌Love Language Test Chapman's Five Love Languages framework Chapman (1992)
🤝Empathy Test Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI) Davis (1980)
😰Social Anxiety Social Phobia Inventory (SPIN) Connor et al. (2000)
👂Sensory Processing Highly Sensitive Person Scale (HSP Scale) Aron & Aron (1997)
💾Memory Test Wechsler Memory Scale (WMS) — subtypes Wechsler (1945)
⚙️Processing Speed Cognitive Failures Questionnaire (CFQ) — self-report cognitive processing measure Broadbent et al. (1982)
🔁Working Memory Digit Span / N-back task research Miller (1956); Baddeley (1992)
🎯Executive Function Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function — Adult (BRIEF-A) Roth, Isquith & Gioia (2005)
📖Dyslexia Screening Dyslexia Adult Screening Test (DAST) Fawcett & Nicolson (1998)
Important: Our assessments are adapted from the instruments listed above for self-discovery and educational use. They are not administered under clinical supervision, have not undergone the same validation process as the original instruments, and should not be used as a substitute for a professional psychological evaluation. Results are for personal insight only. For full details see our Medical & Health Disclaimer.